The Impact of Nature Exposure on Mental Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Meta-Analytic Evidence, and Clinical Applications

Abstract

Nature exposure has been proposed as a low-cost, scalable intervention for improving mental health and cognitive function, yet the magnitude and specificity of its benefits remain debated.

This systematic literature review synthesizes research published between 2012 and 2025 from PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to examine how different forms of nature contact, such as green space access, forest therapy, nature-based interventions, and passive nature viewing, affect psychological well-being and cognitive performance.

The review integrates two principal theoretical frameworks: Attention Restoration Theory (ART), which posits that natural environments replenish directed attention through involuntary “soft fascination,” and Stress Reduction Theory (SRT), which emphasizes the psychophysiological calming effects of nature via the parasympathetic nervous system.

Meta-analytic evidence indicates that nature exposure reliably improves mood and reduces negative affect, with forest therapy showing moderate-to-large effects on stress (SMD = –0.71), depressive symptoms (SMD = –0.68), and anxiety (SMD = –0.77) in clinical populations. However, evidence for cognitive benefits is weaker and more domain-specific: working memory and attentional control show reliable improvements, but effects are small (mean SMD ≈ 0.20 to 0.30) and highly heterogeneous.

A meta-analysis of 80 studies (273 outcomes) found that nature is more restorative than non-nature exposure for overall cognitive capacity, with benefits largest after approximately 30 minutes of exposure. Green space access is associated with reduced odds of depression (OR = 0.71) and anxiety (OR = 0.73) during population-level crises, and residential greenness is associated with a 15% lower risk of neurodegenerative diseases (pooled HR = 0.85), though evidence quality is very low due to high heterogeneity and bias.

Neurobiologically, nature exposure in children and youth is associated with increased prefrontal cortex gray matter volume, decreased sympathetic activity, increased parasympathetic activity, and, when combined with cognitive task engagement, enhanced attentional processing reflected in increased brain activity. Moderators include exposure duration (30-minute optimum), cognitive fatigue state (larger benefits for fatigued individuals), age (children and adolescents benefit equally), and intervention type (multisession forest therapy outperforms single exposures).

Significant gaps persist regarding long-term durability of effects, the translation of experimental findings into real-world urban planning, the distinction between active (hiking, gardening) and passive (viewing, walking) nature contact, and the development of standardized, dose-response guidelines.

The review concludes by proposing a research agenda focused on large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials of nature-based interventions in clinical populations; the integration of multimodal outcome assessment (self-report, physiological, neuroimaging, behavioral); the identification of active therapeutic ingredients and mechanistic pathways; and the translation of evidence into actionable public health and urban design policies for dementia prevention and mental health promotion.

Authors:

Eric Bahufite

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/RSI.2026.1307000216

Subject Category: Psychology

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2902-2919

Keywords

nature exposure; green space; mental health; cognitive function

References

1. Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015a). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015b). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567–8572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510459112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Browning, M. H. E. M., & Rigolon, A. (2019). Could nature help children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)? A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dzhambov, A. M., Hartig, T., Markevych, I., Tilov, B., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2018). Urban residential greenspace and mental health in youth: Different approaches to testing multiple pathways yield different conclusions. Environmental Research, 160, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., & Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 075001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gidlow, C. J., Jones, M. V., Hurst, G., Masterson, D., Clark-Carter, D., Tarvainen, M. P., Smith, G., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gladwell, V. F., Brown, D. K., Wood, C., Sandercock, G. R., & Barton, J. L. (2013). The great outdoors: How a green exercise environment can benefit all. Extreme Physiology & Medicine, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-7648-2-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Schünemann, H. J., Tugwell, P., & Knottnerus, A. (2011). GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(4), 380–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. James, P., Banay, R. F., Hart, J. E., & Laden, F. (2015). A review of the health benefits of greenness. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-015-0043-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2027–2037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kuo, M. (2015). How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kuo, F. E., & Faber-Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580–1586. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lee, J., Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2011). Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health, 125(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.09.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Li, Q. (2010). Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-008-0068-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., de Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P., Schellevis, F. G., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63(12), 967–973. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.079038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Brauer, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Lupp, G., Richardson, E. A., Astell-Burt, T., Dimitrova, D., Feng, X., Sadeh, M., Standl, M., Heinrich, J., & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mason, L., Ronconi, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2024). Benefits of nature exposure on cognitive functioning in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nehlig, A. (2010). Is caffeine a cognitive enhancer? Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 20(Suppl 1), S85–S94. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-091315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2016). Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 19(7), 305–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-009-0086-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6, 28551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., … & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sterne, J. A. C., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., … & Higgins, J. P. T. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ, 355, i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., … & Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Stevenson, M. P., Schilhab, T., & Bentsen, P. (2018). The relationship between nature exposures and attention restoration, as moderated by exposure duration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Taylor, A. F., & Kuo, F. E. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(5), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708323000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Thompson-Coon, J., Boddy, K., Stein, K., Whear, R., Barton, J., & Depledge, M. H. (2011). Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(5), 1761–1772. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102947t [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 85–125). Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Van den Berg, A. E., & Custers, M. H. G. (2011). Gardening promotes neuroendocrine and affective restoration from stress. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310365577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., Bone, A., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9, 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/356119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhang, Y., Li, Q., & Chen, H. (2025). Nature’s shield – Harnessing green spaces to combat dementia: A global meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 178, 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]